Closed for the holidays? We answer 24/7
Answering365

Call Recording Consent Laws: A 50-State Dataset

By Answering365 · Published November 12, 2026 · Data: state statutes, case law and the RCFP Reporter's Recording Guide (checked October 29, 2026); U.S. Census Bureau population estimates, July 1, 2025

More than one in three U.S. residents, 119.5 million people or 35.0%, live in one of the 11 states where recording a phone call takes the consent of everyone on the call (population as of July 1, 2025). Counting Delaware and Michigan, where the law is unsettled, the share is 38.3%.

Key numbers

states where recording a phone call needs everyone’s consent: California, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, Pennsylvania, Washington
11
State statutes and case law, checked October 29, 2026
of U.S. residents live in those states (119.5 million people), against 21.6% of the 50 states and DC
35.0%
Census Bureau, Vintage 2025 estimates (July 1, 2025); our calculation
states where the rule is unsettled (Delaware and Michigan), home to 3.3% of residents
2
State statutes and case law; Census Bureau
one-party jurisdictions, including Washington, DC, with 61.7% of residents
38
State statutes; federal rule 18 U.S.C. § 2511(2)(d)

Who needs everyone’s consent to record a phone call

Phone-call rule in each state and Washington, DC, checked October 29, 2026. Each square is one state. The full list with statutes is in the table below.

Tile map of the phone-call recording consent rule by state. The same information is in the table below.
  • All-party (11)
  • Unsettled (2)
  • One-party (38)

Share of U.S. residents, by phone-call rule

States and residents by phone-call recording consent rule
Phone-call ruleStates (incl. DC)Share of statesResidents, July 1, 2025Share of residents
All-party1121.6%119,547,57135.0%
Unsettled23.9%11,187,8363.3%
One-party3874.5%211,049,45061.7%
United States51341,784,857

States to watch

Two states are unsettled, two split their rules between phone calls and in-person talk, one has the reverse split, and one has a bill pending. These notes are from our law table as checked October 29, 2026.

Delaware

Phone calls: Unsettled

11 Del. C. § 1335(a)(4); 11 Del. C. § 2402(c)(4)

Statutes conflict: the privacy law requires all-party consent, the wiretap law allows one-party. Unsettled; reference guides treat all-party as the cautious reading.

Michigan

Phone calls: Unsettled

Mich. Comp. Laws §§ 750.539a, 750.539c

Uncertain: statute text says all parties, but Sullivan v. Gray (1982) lets a participant record its own call. Michigan Supreme Court has not resolved it.

Connecticut

Phone calls: All-party

Conn. Gen. Stat. §§ 53a-187, 53a-189 (criminal); § 52-570d (civil)

Criminal law is one-party, but civil liability for phone recording requires all parties' consent unless a recorded notice or warning tone is given.

Nevada

Phone calls: All-party

Nev. Rev. Stat. §§ 200.620 (phone), 200.650 (in person)

Lane v. Allstate (1998) read § 200.620 to require all parties' consent for phone calls; in-person recording is generally one-party.

Oregon

Phone calls: One-party

Or. Rev. Stat. § 165.540(1)(a), (1)(c)

Phone calls are one-party. In-person conversations require that all participants be told (upheld by 9th Cir. en banc, Project Veritas v. Schmidt, 2025).

New Jersey

Phone calls: One-party

N.J. Stat. §§ 2A:156A-3, 2A:156A-4(d)

A 2026 bill (S1508) would make New Jersey all-party; not enacted as of this date.

All 50 states and DC

The phone-call rule and statute for each state, with its population. For the notes on every state, see call recording laws by state.

Phone-call recording consent rule, statute and population for each state and DC
StatePhone callsStatuteResidents, July 1, 2025
AlabamaOne-partyAla. Code §§ 13A-11-30, 13A-11-315,193,088
AlaskaOne-partyAlaska Stat. § 42.20.310737,270
ArizonaOne-partyAriz. Rev. Stat. § 13-30057,623,818
ArkansasOne-partyArk. Code § 5-60-1203,114,791
CaliforniaAll-partyCal. Penal Code §§ 632, 632.739,355,309
ColoradoOne-partyColo. Rev. Stat. § 18-9-3036,012,561
ConnecticutAll-partyConn. Gen. Stat. §§ 53a-187, 53a-189 (criminal); § 52-570d (civil)3,688,496
DelawareUnsettled11 Del. C. § 1335(a)(4); 11 Del. C. § 2402(c)(4)1,059,952
District of ColumbiaOne-partyD.C. Code § 23-542693,645
FloridaAll-partyFla. Stat. § 934.03(2)(d)23,462,518
GeorgiaOne-partyGa. Code §§ 16-11-62, 16-11-66(a)11,302,748
HawaiiOne-partyHaw. Rev. Stat. § 803-42(b)(3)(A)1,432,820
IdahoOne-partyIdaho Code § 18-6702(2)(d)2,029,733
IllinoisAll-party720 ILCS 5/14-2(a)12,719,141
IndianaOne-partyInd. Code §§ 35-33.5-1-5, 35-33.5-5-56,973,333
IowaOne-partyIowa Code § 808B.2(2)(c)3,238,387
KansasOne-partyKan. Stat. § 21-6101(a)(1)2,977,220
KentuckyOne-partyKy. Rev. Stat. §§ 526.010, 526.0204,606,864
LouisianaOne-partyLa. Rev. Stat. § 15:1303(C)(4)4,618,189
MaineOne-partyMe. Rev. Stat. tit. 15, §§ 709, 7101,414,874
MarylandAll-partyMd. Code, Cts. & Jud. Proc. § 10-402(c)(3)6,265,347
MassachusettsAll-partyMass. Gen. Laws ch. 272, § 997,154,084
MichiganUnsettledMich. Comp. Laws §§ 750.539a, 750.539c10,127,884
MinnesotaOne-partyMinn. Stat. § 626A.02(2)(d)5,830,405
MississippiOne-partyMiss. Code § 41-29-531(e)2,954,160
MissouriOne-partyMo. Rev. Stat. § 542.402.2(3)6,270,541
MontanaAll-partyMont. Code § 45-8-213(1)(c)1,144,694
NebraskaOne-partyNeb. Rev. Stat. § 86-290(2)(c)2,018,006
NevadaAll-partyNev. Rev. Stat. §§ 200.620 (phone), 200.650 (in person)3,282,188
New HampshireAll-partyN.H. Rev. Stat. § 570-A:21,415,342
New JerseyOne-partyN.J. Stat. §§ 2A:156A-3, 2A:156A-4(d)9,548,215
New MexicoOne-partyN.M. Stat. § 30-12-12,125,498
New YorkOne-partyN.Y. Penal Law §§ 250.00, 250.0520,002,427
North CarolinaOne-partyN.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-28711,197,968
North DakotaOne-partyN.D. Cent. Code § 12.1-15-02799,358
OhioOne-partyOhio Rev. Code § 2933.5211,900,510
OklahomaOne-partyOkla. Stat. tit. 13, § 176.44,123,288
OregonOne-partyOr. Rev. Stat. § 165.540(1)(a), (1)(c)4,273,586
PennsylvaniaAll-party18 Pa.C.S. §§ 5703, 5704(4)13,059,432
Rhode IslandOne-partyR.I. Gen. Laws § 11-35-211,114,521
South CarolinaOne-partyS.C. Code § 17-30-305,570,274
South DakotaOne-partyS.D. Codified Laws § 23A-35A-20935,094
TennesseeOne-partyTenn. Code §§ 39-13-601, 39-13-6047,315,076
TexasOne-partyTex. Penal Code § 16.0231,709,821
UtahOne-partyUtah Code § 77-23a-43,538,904
VermontOne-partyNo state wiretap statute; 18 U.S.C. § 2511(2)(d) applies644,663
VirginiaOne-partyVa. Code § 19.2-628,880,107
WashingtonAll-partyRev. Code Wash. § 9.73.0308,001,020
West VirginiaOne-partyW. Va. Code § 62-1D-31,766,147
WisconsinOne-partyWis. Stat. § 968.31(2)(c)5,972,787
WyomingOne-partyWyo. Stat. § 7-3-702588,753

What this means for businesses that take calls

  • Plan for all-party callers.More than a third of U.S. residents live in a state that requires everyone’s consent. If you record calls from customers in many states, a notice at the start of the call (“this call may be recorded”) is the common way businesses handle it.
  • A call can carry two states’ laws.Courts have applied the stricter state’s rule to calls placed into that state; the California Supreme Court did so in Kearney v. Salomon Smith Barney.
  • Treat the unsettled states with care. In Delaware and Michigan the statutes or court rulings point both ways, and many businesses follow the all-party rule there.
  • Ask your answering service. Find out whether calls on your account are recorded, how long recordings are kept, who can listen, and what callers hear about it. Questions to ask about recording and consent.

This dataset is general information, not legal advice. Ask a lawyer licensed in your state about your situation.

Method

Our law table classifies each state by the rule that applies when a participant records a phone call: one-party (one person on the call may consent, as under federal law, 18 U.S.C. § 2511(2)(d)), all-party (everyone on the call must consent) or unsettled (statutes or court rulings conflict). It was compiled from the state statutes, the court decisions that interpret them and the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press (RCFP) Reporter’s Recording Guide, and checked on October 29, 2026. Where a state has different rules for phone calls and in-person conversations, the phone-call rule is used.

Population is the Census Bureau’s Vintage 2025 resident population estimate for July 1, 2025. We added up the residents of the states in each group and divided by the U.S. total (341,784,857, the sum of the 50 states and DC).

Before publishing we re-read the RCFP guide’s summary for every state and the official statute text for the all-party states whose legislature websites serve it, and checked every population figure against the Census Bureau’s published table. We plan a full recheck of every state each year; the next is due by October 2027.

Limits

  • Residents are not callers. The shares describe where people live, not where your calls come from.
  • Each rule has exceptions, such as recorded notices, warning tones, an expectation of privacy, or law enforcement. Some states protect cellphone calls differently. See the notes on the full table.
  • Laws change through new statutes and court rulings between our yearly checks.
  • Recording rules are only one part of call compliance. Health privacy, telemarketing and data retention rules are separate.
  • The RCFP guide is a secondary source and many of its state pages are several years old, so statutes and later court rulings take precedence in our table.

Sources

Statute and case citations for each state are in the CSV and on the full table, each with its source link.

Cite this study

Answering365. (2026). Call Recording Consent Laws: A 50-State Dataset. Answering365 Research. https://answering365.com/research/call-recording-consent-laws-dataset/

Download the data: call-recording-consent-laws-dataset.csv. Free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 with credit to Answering365 and a link to this page.

Setting up call recording with an answering service?

Recording is one of the things to settle before calls go live. The buyer’s guide covers the rest.